ESET Eesti Blogi

Influencers in the crosshairs: How cybercriminals are targeting content creators

It’s not an easy time to be an influencer. Brands are spending less, ad revenue is declining and competition is fierce – including from AI-generated influencers and impersonators. According to one study, around half of the industry makes just $15,000 or less per year, while just one in 10 pull in over $100,000. As if that wasn’t enough, there’s another challenge: influencers are an increasingly popular target for cybercriminals. A recent spear-phishing campaign abusing brands such as Tesla and Red Bull highlights the potential risks.

Account compromise could have a devastating impact, not only on the victim but also their followers and potential brand clients. If you’re a social media content creator, it may be time to revisit those account security best practices.

Why do influencers matter to hackers?

Threat actors are usually looking for several things in a potential online victim. If they’re on the hunt for influencer social media accounts to hijack, they’ll want ones with as many followers as possible. This means their scams or malware will be distributed far and wide. They ideally also want to target influencers who have built long-term trust with their audience, through months or years of providing advice online. Trust could also be earned through verified status badges. Either way, it means followers are more likely to click on the links in these accounts without thinking.

It goes without saying that hackers also need those accounts to be easy to compromise. Anything protected with a single weak password is a gift to an opportunistic cybercriminal.

This phishing email delivers malware that deletes the victim’s browser cookies, forcing them to re-enter their login credentials, which are then sent to the attacker. (source: The PC Security Channel)

How do they get hacked?

When it comes to the targeting of influencers, attacks begin with the social media account itself – whether it’s X (formerly Twitter), YouTube, TikTok, Instagram or another platform. On rare occasions, the end goal is state-sponsored disinformation. But more often than not we’re talking about financially motivated cybercrime. There are several ways to gain access to accounts, notably:

It should be noted that AI is helping cybecriminals achieve their goals by crafting more convincing phishing emails in flawless local languages. It also supports campaigns by gathering background information on targets which can be used for these and SIM swapping attacks. And AI can make brute-force attacks faster and more effective.

What happens next?

With access to a high-value influencer account, a cybercriminal might want to sell it immediately online to the highest bidder. Or they could use it themselves. Either way, it’s most likely to be used to advertise crypto investment scams and other get-rich-quick schemes designed to trick followers out of their hard-earned cash. Or to post malicious links which could install malware on followers’ machines.

A threat actor may also try to extort their victim into paying them money to regain access; for example by threatening to post vulgar or inflammatory content. They may be able to access follower contact databases, which could be sold and/or used to target followers directly with spam and phishing attacks. A hijacked account might theoretically also be abused to post false claims about brands connected with that influencer.

If threat actors also manage to compromise an influencer’s e-commerce account (using the same techniques listed above), they may be able to divert incoming funds from followers.

The bottom line is identity theft-related security risks for followers, trashed reputation for brands and influencers, and potentially direct losses for content creators.

Under lock and key

Faced with what could be an existential risk, influencers need a plan of action. That should be based around solid best practices for account security. Consider:

An influencer’s reputation ultimately defines their commercial success. It must be protected at all costs.

Read the full analysis on WeLiveSecurity →

Exit mobile version